Minnesota's economic development funding 'cut, cut, cut'
ST. PAUL -- Minnesota's economic development programs fall victim to the state budget deficit.
"We cut, we cut, we cut," Rep. Tom Rukavina, DFL-Virginia, said. "We can't create jobs when we are cutting, but we did the best that we could. ... I wish I had a lot better bill, but I had to cut."
The Senate voted to cut economic development funding 38-28 Monday. The House did the same on Tuesday, 74-57. In both cases, some Democrats joined Republicans in opposing the measure. Minnesota economic development programs would be trimmed $21 million in a year when programs are facing cuts in light of a $4.6 billion state budget deficit. Examples of the cuts include housing, 3.5 percent less than the current state budget; historical society, 6.2 percent less; tourism, 3.5 percent less; and the state arts board, 16.6 percent less.
The House-Senate compromise funding proposal cuts state economic development funds from $284 million being spent in the current budget to $263 million in the two-year budget starting July 1. The bill raises fees $900,000.
Usually, the economic development funding bill is called a "jobs bill." That is not what House Minority Leader Marty Seifert, R-Marshall, called this one.
"It's a jobless bill..." Seifert said.
Rukavina said his measure adds $11 million to help the state's unemployed.
Sen. David Tomassoni, DFL-Chisholm, said the measure is a true compromise. He said the conference committee improved the bill from the one 49 senators supported last month.
"It has more money for job creation, it has more money for housing," Tomassoni said.
The most heated discussion came on a provision that forgives a loan to the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul. It would forgive a $35 million loan payment, which Republicans said amounts to providing state funding for a sports arena.
Rep. Denny McNamara, R-Hastings, said it is not fair to force taxpayers around the state to pay for a new hockey rink at the Xcel when they face other economic problems.
Rukavina, however, countered that the new ice rink would bring the state more money than the forgiven loan payment.