U.S. Senate ballot recount could take weeks
ST. PAUL - A note to Minnesotans: Get comfortable, as the U.S. Senate election trial is going to some time.
There is no trial timeline, but a brief courtroom comment Wednesday by one of three judges hearing the election lawsuit confirmed that the case is far from over.
Judge Denise Reilly of Hennepin County said the court will review and count absentee ballots that the judges decide were wrongly excluded from the Nov. 4 election and the recount.
"The panel is going to take its own view of each of these ballots and make sure that every legally cast and wrongfully rejected ballot is opened and counted," Reilly told attorneys for Norm Coleman and Al Franken.
Reilly's statement was the first indication after eight trial days that the judges will count ballots they believe should be included in the tally, after inspecting the sealed ballot envelopes. Reilly is joined on the panel by Judge Kurt Marben of Pennington County and Judge Elizabeth Hayden of Stearns County.
The judges are deciding Coleman's lawsuit that challenges Franken's 225-vote victory. State law says absentee ballots can be rejected if they do not meet certain criteria, but Coleman claims as many as a few thousand ballots were wrongly rejected.
"They're going to enfranchise every Minnesotan whose vote ought to be allowed to count," Coleman attorney Ben Ginsberg said of the judges.
The judicial review will take time. Coleman's campaign, which seeks to have up to 4,800 rejected absentee ballots considered for possible counting, on Wednesday introduced as evidence more than 100 Washington County rejected absentee ballots, asking county official Kevin Corbid to explain what happened with each ballot.
A similar process could be used for each of the remaining 86 Minnesota counties, Ginsberg said.
"We won't be done next week," he said. "However long they want it to (last), we're for it."
Franken's team asked the court Wednesday to consider changing which absentee ballots will be part of the trial.
An outside observer predicted the absentee ballot issue and other issues at play in the case mean the trial will last at least another month.
"I am not anticipating this being resolved before March 1," Hamline University professor and election expert David Schultz said recently.