SUBSCRIBE NOW Just 99¢ for your first month

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Winona LaDuke column: Enbridge pipeline is deteriorating, so what comes next?

Most Minnesotans don't realize that we boast the largest inland oil spill in U.S. history. On March 3, in 1991, the Line 3 pipeline ruptured near Grand Rapids, Minnesota, spilling over 1.7 million gallons of oil into the Prairie River, after a ne...

Winona LaDuke of environmental activist group Honor the Earth speaks to a gathering hosted by the Brainerd chapter of the League of Women Voters on Thursday. Zach Kayser/Brainerd Dispatch
Winona LaDuke of environmental activist group Honor the Earth speaks to a gathering hosted by the Brainerd chapter of the League of Women Voters on Thursday. Zach Kayser/Brainerd Dispatch
We are part of The Trust Project.

Most Minnesotans don't realize that we boast the largest inland oil spill in U.S. history.

On March 3, in 1991, the Line 3 pipeline ruptured near Grand Rapids, Minnesota, spilling over 1.7 million gallons of oil into the Prairie River, after a negligently delayed response by Lakehead Pipeline, Enbridge's predecessor.

The Prairie is a tributary of the Mississippi. If not for the 18 inches of ice on top of the river, the spill could have poisoned the drinking water of millions downstream, and would likely be remembered very differently. Thankfully, this was back in the days when our territories were still frozen and snow-covered in March, before climate change had fully sunk its teeth.

Due to sheer luck, the cleanup was relatively quick and effective, so the spill received nowhere near as much media attention as Enbridge's catastrophic Kalamazoo River spill of 2010. (That spill was found by a local resident and it took Enbridge 17 hours to close it down). Enbridge has spent more than $1.2 billion dollars (and still counting) and the better part of a decade cleaning up the Kalamazoo mess, and they haven't finished yet. It turns out that 1.1 million gallons of Alberta tar sands crude oil is not easily removed from riverbanks and sensitive wetlands.

Minnesota, take heed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Line 3 is now 56 years old, well past its intended lifespan, but still carries crude oil across Northern Minnesota on its way from Alberta to Superior, Wisconsin, cutting directly across the Leech Lake and Fond du Lac Reservations. Originally owned by Lakehead Pipeline, it is now part of Enbridge's Mainline Corridor, which has six pipelines in it - the old Lakehead lines 1, 2, 3, and 4, plus the new Alberta Clipper and its diluent companion, Line 13.

Many governmental reports refer to Lines 3 and 4 as a single unit, because of the complicated ways they work in tandem. Together, they are responsible for not only the 1991 Grand Rapids spill, but also the catastrophic 2002 spill near Cohasset, MN; the 2007 explosion in Clearbrook, MN, that killed two workers; a serious spill in Regina, Alberta in December 2014; and countless other ruptures and spills.

Enbridge reports that since 1990, Line 3 has had at least fifteen large spills (more than fifty barrels each), but the number of small spills and leaks is anybody's guess. Line 3 is crumbling. According to Enbridge's own data, it has ten times as many corrosion anomalies per mile than any other pipeline in their Mainline System. They estimate over half a million structural anomalies in Line 3, which is about 1 every 10 feet. Enbridge Integrity Supervisor Laura Kennett has testified, "I consider Line 3 to be in the deterioration stage ... as external corrosion growth is increasing in an exponential fashion."

The company has reduced the pressure to the bare minimum that still allows oil to flow, and spends billions of dollars digging up and fixing pieces of it (they anticipate needing at least 12,000 integrity digs in the next decade just for maintenance). In other words, Line 3 is a ticking time bomb.

They cite this as justification for building a new one. But that is backwards thinking. The rational response would be to shut it down and protect us all. They have a few other lines...

Enbridge disagrees. Instead of cleaning up this mess, and putting Minnesotan union members to work doing it, Enbridge plans to abandon the pipeline in the ground, along with inevitable contamination, and then walk away, and build an entirely new Line 3 pipeline in a brand new corridor. Ironically, while Minnesota has strict regulation for underground storage tanks, we have no such protection for 300 miles of such tanks- ie an old pipeline.

The State of Minnesota, including the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), has the power and responsibility to regulate pipeline abandonment, but there is currently no plan. Because Line 3 is the first crude oil pipeline to be abandoned in our state, there is a risk that the PUC will avoid their responsibility and set a disastrous precedent. But tribal governments, landowners, local businesses, and concerned community members across the north are standing up to say no, and demand accountability.

This past month, the Bad River Band of Ojibwe (Wisconsin) decided to deny Enbridge a continued easement on the pipeline citing risk to water as their primary concern. The proposed "Line 3 Replacement" sets a dangerous precedent. It is not a replacement. It's a new pipeline with larger diameter pipe, designed to carry a completely different type of oil through a brand new corridor, with more than double the shipping capacity. The new Line 3 could eventually carry over a million barrels per day, of the dirtiest oil in the world.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is time for Enbridge to clean up its old mess. Not make a new one. And, it's time for us all to move on. Enbridge has a $5 billion plus renewable energy portfolio. That's what Minnesota deserves-the next and best technology, not 50 more years of risk to our water and future.

Related Topics: LINE 3 REPLACEMENT PROJECT
What to read next